Very rigid mentality
Very rigid mentality structures actually cover a narrower range of tactical priorities than rigid (and, potentially, balanced) mentality structures. Like rigid mentality structures,
very rigid mentality structures organizes tactical priorities according to position within the team’s defensive shape, but unlike rigid mentality structures, there is less of a general tactical distinction between wide and central players.
This means that wide players are not specifically relied upon to help quickly link the various parts of the team, though the team as a whole will look to prevent either the attack or defence from becoming isolated by maintaining a slightly more compact shape. In practice, this means the team will be slightly slower to break from its defensive shape going forward, though centrebacks and forwards will also be slightly more inclined to help support the midfield compared to a rigid system.
Basically, very rigid mentality structures are intended to produce highly organized football in which the team can execute a focused, precise attacking approach while maintaining the ability to quickly transition back to its defensive shape at a moment’s notice.
As with rigid mentality structures, this means players have a distinct and clearly defined function within the team with defensive position having an even greater influence on the decion-making of wide players. Accordingly, this can make the team’s approach very predictable, though this isn’t necessarily a problem for managers looking to perfect a highly specfic style of play.
Very rigid mentality structures should also not be equated with limiting specific position’s contribution to a single phase of play. Again, team mentality and duty are the primary factors in determining whether specific players get forward or drop back to defend.
Đọc kỹ mấy phần bôi đen thì thấy đúng là có vấn đề thật