Share game FM24 (PC)
Trang thứ 1 trong tổng số 2 trang 12 Trang cuốiTrang cuối
Hiển thị kết quả từ 1 tói 10 trong tổng số 13

Chủ đề: Tactics Guide

  1. #1
    Ngày tham gia
    25 Nov 2006
    Số bài viết
    334

    Tactics Guide

    Tổng hợp từ fm-britain.co.uk

    Mentality

    1 vài gợi ý cho việc set mentality cho đội. Chúng nó viết nhiều nhưng tóm lại là như thế này

    Home Framework
    GK 14
    DC 15
    FB 16
    MCd 17
    ML/R 18
    MCa 19
    FC 20

    Away Framework
    GK 1
    DC 2
    FB 3
    MCd 4
    ML/R 5
    MCa 6
    FC 7

    Attacking Away Framework

    GK 6
    DC 7
    FB 8
    MCd 9
    ML/R 10
    MCa 11
    FC 12

    Ghi chú:
    GK: Goal keeper
    DC: Central defender
    FB: Full back
    MCd: Defending midfielder
    ML/R: Right/Left midfielder
    Mca: Attacking midfielder
    FC: Forward

    ML/R 10: số lượng click kể từ vị trí ngoài cùng bên trái (0 click)

    Tổng hợp từ fm-britain.co.uk

    Chủ đề tương tự:

  2. #2
    Ngày tham gia
    01 Jul 2007
    Số bài viết
    1,178
    Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bài viết của vietales Bài viết
    Tổng hợp từ fm-britain.co.uk

    Mentality

    1 vài gợi ý cho việc set mentality cho đội. Chúng nó viết nhiều nhưng tóm lại là như thế này

    Home Framework
    GK 14
    DC 15
    FB 16
    MCd 17
    ML/R 18
    MCa 19
    FC 20

    Away Framework
    GK 1
    DC 2
    FB 3
    MCd 4
    ML/R 5
    MCa 6
    FC 7

    Attacking Away Framework

    GK 6
    DC 7
    FB 8
    MCd 9
    ML/R 10
    MCa 11
    FC 12

    Ghi chú:
    GK: Goal keeper
    DC: Central defender
    FB: Full back
    MCd: Defending midfielder
    ML/R: Right/Left midfielder
    Mca: Attacking midfielder
    FC: Forward

    ML/R 10: số lượng click kể từ vị trí ngoài cùng bên trái (0 click)

    Tổng hợp từ fm-britain.co.uk



    --------> Ông viết như thế thì mấy người mới chơi đố ai hiểu giải thích rõ ràng ra chứ


    Because The Main One

  3. #3
    Ngày tham gia
    25 Nov 2006
    Số bài viết
    334
    @henry: tôi giải thích ở phía dưới còn gì T_T
    Ví dụ: FC 12 có nghĩa là khi set mentality cho FC thì click 12 cái


  4. #4
    Ngày tham gia
    25 Nov 2006
    Số bài viết
    334
    Team Instructions

    Use Target Man

    Thiết lập này hoạt động cực kì tốt và có thể tạo ra rất nhiều cơ hội nếu được sử dụng 1 cách chính xác. Target man nguyên mẫu: cao, to và khỏe có thể tàn phá cầu môn đối phương nếu như được set là no forward run và bóng được phân phối to head, to feet hoặc mixed. Hiển nhiên nếu như set run onto ball thì ta phải set cho hắn forward run.

    Use Playmaker

    Một Playmaker cần phải được xếp ở 1 vị trí có thể nhận được bóng một cách dễ dàng vì vậy nếu như để anh ta chạy lên khu vực tấn công quá nhiều sẽ làm giảm đi hiệu quả của anh ấy. Set forward run ở mức thấp hoặc mixed, closing down ở mức thấp, set zonal marking và có thể set free role sẽ giúp phát huy hết khả năng của Playmaker

    Play Offside

    Sử dụng chiến thuật này kết hợp với việc sử dụng 1 hàng phòng ngự dâng cao, vì thế nếu như bẫy việt vị bị phá thì hậu vệ vẫn có thời gian để quay về. Vì vậy ý tưởng này thích hợp với Home Framework và sẽ có ít hiệu quả hơn với Away Framework. Hiển nhiên, hậu quả sẽ càng lớn hơn nếu như hàng phòng ngự toàn những cầu thủ chậm, vì vậy nếu như bạn có 1 hàng phòng ngự nhanh thì rất thích hợp để chơi bẫy việt vị (lỡ may bị phá còn có cơ đuổi).

    Counter Attack



    Individual Instructions

    Run With Ball, Long Shots, Through Balls and Cross Ball

    Trong cách chỉnh của tôi, cho cả chiến thuật khi đá sân nhà và sân khách, không có 1 cầu thủ nào thực hiện các chỉ dẫn trên quá thường xuyên - often. Việc set các chỉ dẫn trên ở mức mixed sẽ đảm bảo sự vững vàng trong chiến thuật do không có 1 cầu thủ nào tuân theo 1 cách máy móc các chỉ dẫn trên, nếu như gặp các đối thủ yếu hơn mình thì không sao nhưng nếu như gặp các đối thủ mạnh hơn thì.... Do vậy, nếu như chắc chắn rằng cầu thủ của mình có ảnh hưởng lớn đến trận đấu với chỉ dẫn often bởi vì anh ta giỏi hơn người kèm của mình thì hẵng chuyển sang often.

    Cross From

    Home Tactics: Wingers cross byline, full-backs mixed.

    Away Tactics: Wingers cross mixed, full-backs [b]deep[/i].

    Cross Aim

    Điều này phụ thuộc vào cách set chiến thuật của từng người.
    - Nếu như sử dụng 1 tên Target man cao, to, khỏe ta nên set cross aimtarget man.
    - Nếu như cả 2 tiền đạo đều không chiến tốt thì mixed là sự lựa chọn tốt.
    - Nếu như 1 trong 2 tiền đạo nhanh hơn người kia set cross aimnear post.
    - Cross aim far post sẽ tạo cơ hội cho 2 tên Winger.

    Swap Position

    Sử dụng tốt nhất với MC và FC. Nếu như sử dụng Playmaker, sử dụng Swap position sẽ giữ anh ta luôn ở vai trò là 1 playmaker, nhưng thỉnh thoảng cũng khiến cho hắn chơi thấp hơn hoặc cao hơn bình thường. Điều này sẽ khiến việc kéo giãn đội hình đối thủ 1 cách hiệu quả hơn. Cũng như thế, 1 Target man, nếu như hắn nhanh ta có thể để hắn hoán đổi giữa các vị trí mà ta set forward runrare hoặc mixed

    [i]Free Role[i]

    Đặc biệt hiệu quả với AMC playmaker.

    Hold Up Ball

    Điều này dường như sẽ cho đội bóng của 1 lợi thế nết như được set 1 cách chính xác. Tốt nhất là ta set hold up ball cho những cầu thủ ở trước hàng phòng ngự như DMC hoặc hậu vệ cánh, điều này sẽ cho phép đội bóng lấy lại được đội hình và phản công. Targetman hoặc tiền đạo lùi cũng có thể set hold up ball để chờ những cầu thủ khác lên tham gia tấn công.

    Lần sửa bài viết gần nhất bởi vietales : 31-07-2007 vào lúc 10:38 PM

  5. #5
    Ngày tham gia
    25 Nov 2006
    Số bài viết
    334
    Opposition Instruction

    Đây là 1 trong những phần mới của FM 07.Những chỉ dẫn này có thể trở thành công cụ hiệu quả để hỗ trợ cho việc phòng thủ và có thể trở thành chìa khóa dẫn đến chiến thắng cho nhiều trận đấu, đặc biệt trong những trận đấu căng thẳng và những trận đấu có tỉ lệ (cá cược) chống lại đội bạn.

    Nếu như bạn xem trận đấu với hightlight mode được set là extend hay thậm chí là full match, bạn sẽ nhận thấy hiệu quả của các chỉ dẫn, các cầu thủ sẽ cố gắng tuân theo những chỉ dẫn của bạn khi đối phương có bóng. Điều này thậm chí có thể khiến đối phương “lên cáng” và có thể đó là 1 trong những lý do tại sao opposition instructions trở nên hiệu quả với bất kì cách set marking nào, nhưng dường như kết hợp với zonal marking sẽ mang lại nhiều hiệu quả hơn.

    Sử dụng 1 lượng lớn opposition instructions cho mỗi cầu thủ tấn công (FC,AMC,MC) thậm chí có thể làm giảm đáng kể lần sút cầu môn của đối thủ.

    Sau đây là 1 số gợi ý trong việc set opposition instructions:

    Tiền đạo (Forwards):
    - Tight markingalways đối với bọn (half) decent striker hoặc young striker
    - Closing downalways đối với tiền đạo chậm và never đối với những thằng nào nhanh hoặc được miêu tả là explosive striker.
    - Hard tackling đối với những cây sào như Crouch và những con thú trên không như Bianchi chẳng hạn.
    - Show on to footweaker foot đối với những cầu thủ có lối chơi kỹ thuật.

    Closing down có liên quan đến tốc độ của cầu thủ. Nếu như bạn có 1 hậu vệ có tốc độ chỉ là 6 hay 8 trong khi tiền đạo lại có tốc độ là 16, bạn nên để closing down never. Nhưng nếu như hậu vệ của bạn có tốc độ từ 14 đến 16 nhưng tiền đạo đối phương lại là 1 tiền đạo năng nổ explosive striker thì nên cân nhắc giữa closing down alwaysno specific. Closing down thường có hiệu quả nếu như không có khoảng cách quá lớn về tốc độ giữa hậu vệ và đối phượng được kèm.

    Cầu thủ chạy cánh (Wingers):
    - Tight markingclosing downalways.
    - Show on to footweaker foot với những cầu thủ chơi ở cánh chân thuận (cầu thủ thuận chân phải chơi ở cánh phải và ngược lại).
    - Hard tackling always. Tuy nhiên, nếu như sử dụng hard tackling bạn cần phải để ý đến số lượng lỗi không cần thiết trong khu vực quyết định. Điều này tùy thuộc vào ý thích cá nhân và bạn tin tưởng vào khả năng tackling của cầu thủ bao nhiêu

    Tiền vệ (Midfielders):
    - Closing down always đối với những cầu thủ có khả năng sút xa.
    - Tight marking, closing down always đối với AMC và MC trong vai trò Playmaker

    Những chỉ dẫn này thực sự có thể mang lại sự khác biệt, đặc biệt là khi bạn đã kiểm soát được AMC của đối thủ.

    Trung vệ và thủ môn (Centre backs and Keepers): Closingdown always


    Nếu như phải đối mặt với đối phương có chất lượng hơn đội nhà thì có thể Closingdown always show on weaker footđối với hậu vệ cánh (Fullbacks và Wingbacks). Tuy nhiên ko nên quá lạm dụng nếu không sẽ chỉ phí stamina.

    Còn nữa ...


  6. #6
    Ngày tham gia
    26 Jun 2007
    Số bài viết
    145
    post thì post luôn đi, sao nữa chừng lại đứng lại rùi , giờ tui lại phải đi tìm nguồn đây.

    Vô tình tôi gặp được em
    Vô tình tôi đã yêu em mất rồi
    Vô tình nối tiếp vô tình
    Sao em lại nỡ vô tình với tôi.
    :B84:

  7. #7
    Ngày tham gia
    08 Jan 2007
    Số bài viết
    73
    =Chán thật,bác cứ up up mở mở thế này...
    Chết dân....

    =FOREVER UNDERGROUND=

  8. #8
    Ngày tham gia
    01 Jul 2007
    Số bài viết
    1,178
    Post thì post một lần thui , đằng này cứ post từng tí một thế anh em sốt ruột lắm


    Because The Main One

  9. #9
    Ngày tham gia
    26 Jun 2007
    Số bài viết
    145
    Having looked at three tactic building frameworks, it is now time to delve deeper into some of the other theories behind successful tactical set ups. The following section looks at Mirroring, Defensive Line, Farrows/Sarrows/Barrows, Mentality, Through-Balls, Forward Runs, Run With Ball, Crosses, Hold Up Ball, and Marking. All have been tested successfully with the RoT framework, but not with the 5x5 or Split Global.

    Slider Pairings/Mirroring

    Mirroring basically means ensuring two opposing elements of the game have a slider total of 20. I experimented with mirroring heavily during my last three months on FM06 but didn’t ever get around to writing it up. There are many ways in which to mirror, and the following offers some suggestions.

    Width versus Time Wasting

    The assumption for this mirror is that a home tactic should be wide with low time wasting whereas an away tactic should be narrow with high time wasting. Thus, the mirroring split is:

    Home: Width 15 vs. Time Wasting 5

    Away: Width 5 vs. Time Wasting 15

    I always use the 5/15 split as a starting point as they correspond with the ‘first notch’ of the sliders. Thus 5 is ‘first notch’ rarely and 15 is ‘first notch’ often. From this position attacking can be emphasised via lowering time wasting and raising width by the same factor. Likewise, defence can be emphasised by moving the sliders in the other direction.

    NB: I rarely had to alter sliders from the ‘first notch’ position. Occasionally, I went to a 17-3 split if I was chasing a late goal, but I have never tested emphasising defence.

    Creative Freedom versus Closing Down

    I was having so much success with the Width/Time Wasting split that I decided to try it on a player by player basis. I built a tactic on a CF/CD split in individual instructions. The system looked like so:

    DCs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 3/17

    FBs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 5/15

    MCd: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 5/15

    ML/R: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 10/10

    MCa: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 15/5

    FCs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 15/5

    NB: I only tried this system at home. For away games I went for CD of 5 across the board (CF as above system) with the exception of the MCd who remained at 15. However, there is no reason it shouldn’t work (see Level Assumptions before deciding to employ such a system in LLM).

    Mentality versus Passing

    The Width/Time Wasting and the Creative Freedom/Closing Down mirrors worked so well that I decided to experiment with Passing/Mentality. My assumption was that DCs would benefit from direct passing, whereas a high mentality attacker only needs to play quick flicks. Following the RoT framework I devised the following.

    DCs: Mentality/Passing = 6/14

    FBs: Mentality/Passing = 10/10

    MCd: Mentality/Passing = 8/12

    MR/L: Mentality/Passing = 12/8

    MCa: Mentality/Passing = 16/4

    FC: Mentality/Passing = 14/6

    ST: Mentality = 18/2

    The results were very impressive. There is an argument for transposing the passing of the MCa and the FCd if you wish.

    NB: This passing system was designed for High Quality sides. For Championship – high L2 I would suggest raising passing by 2 across the board so the mentality/passing total equals 22. For LLM raise by 4 so the total = 24 (see Level Assumptions). The GK should always pass to 2 higher than the DCs, no matter what mentality setting you use.

    Tempo and Front Three Creative Freedom

    There is evidence emerging in the Demo that tempo and front three (FCs & AMC/MCa) creative freedom should be matched. Therefore, if tempo is at 5 then CF for the front three should also be 5. If tempo is 15 then CF should be 15. The following reason seems to apply.

    5/15 and 15/5 tempo/CF systems don't work as well, or look as good, because the two variables don't compliment each other. If tempo is high then players will look to move the ball around quickly and get it further upfield sooner. This is hindered by the 3 forward players not being allowed to stray from position, which is required in order for them to create spaces into which to pass the ball.

    A slow tempo means players won't rush with passing and hold the ball up a lot. When making a pass players will try to keep it simple. This is complimented by players staying in their own positions. Therefore, the 5/5 and 15/15 systems work more effectively.

    There are two things to take into consideration here. Firstly, there is the degree of tiredness players will suffer if they are playing high tempo football all match. Tempo/CF at 15/15 with all attacking players on high forward runs often will lead to fatigue. Therefore, high CF/high temp systems need to be employed realistically (circa Arsenal in their fast-fast-slow style). Secondly, it obviously influences the mirroring of CF/CD when applied to attacking players. Further testing is needed (see Future Testing/Closing Down).

    N.B. It may be that a 5/15 tempo/CF split works well in a counter attacking system although a lot more testing is required.

    Defensive Line

    The assumption for the defensive line is that a high defensive line keeps your team close together and is thus ideal for away games. A high defensive line should be equal to the mentality of your most attacking midfielder. However, if you are using a DMC then it should drop by at least 2 notches from that setting or the DMC will get dragged too close to the d-line and fail to perform adequate covering duties.

    A low defensive line is important when you are playing ultra-defensive systems such as the dreaded 3-3-2-1-1. In such systems the opposition FC plays very deep and a deep defensive line will ensure that the FC is covered by the DMC/MCd. The DCs will stop him if he gets past the DMC, but in general the DMC will win the ball or force a hurried clearance which is mopped up by the DCs. They are in a lot of space so have plenty of passing options available to recycle the ball back into the attacking third of the pitch. If the d-line is too high they won’t have easy options as they are covering the FC and too much time will be wasted in trying to win the ball back for them to be able to play easy passes into space (see Breaking Down the 3-3-2-1-1).

    Farrows/Sarrows/Barrows

    My preferred system is a 4-4-2 Diamond so I’ll use that as a guide. These rules should be pretty much transferable to any formation with a little thought.

    Ultra-Attack: Long farrowed ML/R, Short farrowed FBs. This farrowing combination allows the wide players to double up on the defending side. If it is working you will see a lot of crosses nodded in at the far post by the corresponding winger.

    Attack: Long farrowed ML/R. This allows for constant pressure on the opposition whilst maintaining a tighter defensive base.

    Possession: Short farrowed ML/R, short barrowed AMC. This ensures a box-like structure around the opposition penalty area but remains more focussed on possession than on creating chances.

    Defend Lead: Sarrowed FCs: Combined with a tight defensive system sarrowed FCs offer plenty of opportunities to exploit the channels. If the AI is pushing its FBs forward expect a host of counter-attacking chances.

    NB: I also play an alternate 4-2-3-1 system that has long farrowed ML/R. On paper it looks more defensive than the Defend Lead system, but it actually focuses on getting four players forward (FC, AMC, ML/R) whereas the Defend Lead only attacks with three (FCs, AMC).

    Mentality, Through-Balls, Forward Runs, Run With Ball and Crosses

    The following provides an indicator of how I set up Forward Runs, Through Balls, Crossing & Passing Focus.

    Forward Runs

    Attack: Often FCs, AMC, ML/R. Mixed FBs, DMC. Rarely DCs

    Possession: Often FCs, AMC. Mixed ML/R, FBs. Rarely DMC, DCs

    Defend Lead: Often FCs, AMC. Mixed ML/R. Rarely FBs, DMC, DCs.

    Try Through Balls

    Often: FCd, AMC, DMC. Mixed: FCa, ML/R, FBs, DCs, GK

    Crossing

    Often: ML/R, FBs. Mixed: FCs. Rarely: AMC (unless free role), DMC, DCs

    Focus Passing

    Home: Mixed. This provides greater scope and opportunity for attacking moves.

    Away: Down Both Flanks: Exploits the channels and keeps the ball away from positions from which interceptions will be costly.

    Hold Up Ball

    At least two players should hold up the ball. I usually use my DMC and FCd in these roles, as the DMC holding the ball allows the defence to regroup and the FCd allows for the chance of wingers overlapping him which opens up more attacking angles.

    Marking

    In my opinion man-marking was horribly flawed in FM06. It worked perfectly until the AI switched tactics. Once that happened user defenders remained assigned to their original markee no matter where he was repositioned. Therefore, your DC may well end up man-marking the opposition’s ML. I believe this may have been fixed in ’07, although don’t quote me. Anyway, to combat this perceived problem I advise the following.

    Tight-Zonal: DCs, FBs, DMC

    Loose-Zonal: ML/R, AMC, FCs

    This system fits nicely with the CD/CF set up in that it ensure space for front players whilst keeps the defenders tight on their men. For a more defensive system the ML/Rs could also be pushed into tight-zonal.

    Goalkeeper

    I have always employed a sweeper-keeper with a mentality of 14 with low CF/CD, although there is no reason you shouldn’t follow general RoT settings and have the keeper’s mentality set to 4.
    Source đó, ai đọc hiểu được thì hay, tui dịch từ từ, khi nào xong up lên cho phần tiếng Việt, giờ đọc đỡ phần tiếng Anh này đi

    Vô tình tôi gặp được em
    Vô tình tôi đã yêu em mất rồi
    Vô tình nối tiếp vô tình
    Sao em lại nỡ vô tình với tôi.
    :B84:

  10. #10
    Ngày tham gia
    01 Jul 2007
    Số bài viết
    1,178
    Trích dẫn Trích dẫn bài viết của votinhkhach Bài viết
    Having looked at three tactic building frameworks, it is now time to delve deeper into some of the other theories behind successful tactical set ups. The following section looks at Mirroring, Defensive Line, Farrows/Sarrows/Barrows, Mentality, Through-Balls, Forward Runs, Run With Ball, Crosses, Hold Up Ball, and Marking. All have been tested successfully with the RoT framework, but not with the 5x5 or Split Global.

    Slider Pairings/Mirroring

    Mirroring basically means ensuring two opposing elements of the game have a slider total of 20. I experimented with mirroring heavily during my last three months on FM06 but didn’t ever get around to writing it up. There are many ways in which to mirror, and the following offers some suggestions.

    Width versus Time Wasting

    The assumption for this mirror is that a home tactic should be wide with low time wasting whereas an away tactic should be narrow with high time wasting. Thus, the mirroring split is:

    Home: Width 15 vs. Time Wasting 5

    Away: Width 5 vs. Time Wasting 15

    I always use the 5/15 split as a starting point as they correspond with the ‘first notch’ of the sliders. Thus 5 is ‘first notch’ rarely and 15 is ‘first notch’ often. From this position attacking can be emphasised via lowering time wasting and raising width by the same factor. Likewise, defence can be emphasised by moving the sliders in the other direction.

    NB: I rarely had to alter sliders from the ‘first notch’ position. Occasionally, I went to a 17-3 split if I was chasing a late goal, but I have never tested emphasising defence.

    Creative Freedom versus Closing Down

    I was having so much success with the Width/Time Wasting split that I decided to try it on a player by player basis. I built a tactic on a CF/CD split in individual instructions. The system looked like so:

    DCs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 3/17

    FBs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 5/15

    MCd: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 5/15

    ML/R: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 10/10

    MCa: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 15/5

    FCs: Creative Freedom/Closing Down = 15/5

    NB: I only tried this system at home. For away games I went for CD of 5 across the board (CF as above system) with the exception of the MCd who remained at 15. However, there is no reason it shouldn’t work (see Level Assumptions before deciding to employ such a system in LLM).

    Mentality versus Passing

    The Width/Time Wasting and the Creative Freedom/Closing Down mirrors worked so well that I decided to experiment with Passing/Mentality. My assumption was that DCs would benefit from direct passing, whereas a high mentality attacker only needs to play quick flicks. Following the RoT framework I devised the following.

    DCs: Mentality/Passing = 6/14

    FBs: Mentality/Passing = 10/10

    MCd: Mentality/Passing = 8/12

    MR/L: Mentality/Passing = 12/8

    MCa: Mentality/Passing = 16/4

    FC: Mentality/Passing = 14/6

    ST: Mentality = 18/2

    The results were very impressive. There is an argument for transposing the passing of the MCa and the FCd if you wish.

    NB: This passing system was designed for High Quality sides. For Championship – high L2 I would suggest raising passing by 2 across the board so the mentality/passing total equals 22. For LLM raise by 4 so the total = 24 (see Level Assumptions). The GK should always pass to 2 higher than the DCs, no matter what mentality setting you use.

    Tempo and Front Three Creative Freedom

    There is evidence emerging in the Demo that tempo and front three (FCs & AMC/MCa) creative freedom should be matched. Therefore, if tempo is at 5 then CF for the front three should also be 5. If tempo is 15 then CF should be 15. The following reason seems to apply.

    5/15 and 15/5 tempo/CF systems don't work as well, or look as good, because the two variables don't compliment each other. If tempo is high then players will look to move the ball around quickly and get it further upfield sooner. This is hindered by the 3 forward players not being allowed to stray from position, which is required in order for them to create spaces into which to pass the ball.

    A slow tempo means players won't rush with passing and hold the ball up a lot. When making a pass players will try to keep it simple. This is complimented by players staying in their own positions. Therefore, the 5/5 and 15/15 systems work more effectively.

    There are two things to take into consideration here. Firstly, there is the degree of tiredness players will suffer if they are playing high tempo football all match. Tempo/CF at 15/15 with all attacking players on high forward runs often will lead to fatigue. Therefore, high CF/high temp systems need to be employed realistically (circa Arsenal in their fast-fast-slow style). Secondly, it obviously influences the mirroring of CF/CD when applied to attacking players. Further testing is needed (see Future Testing/Closing Down).

    N.B. It may be that a 5/15 tempo/CF split works well in a counter attacking system although a lot more testing is required.

    Defensive Line

    The assumption for the defensive line is that a high defensive line keeps your team close together and is thus ideal for away games. A high defensive line should be equal to the mentality of your most attacking midfielder. However, if you are using a DMC then it should drop by at least 2 notches from that setting or the DMC will get dragged too close to the d-line and fail to perform adequate covering duties.

    A low defensive line is important when you are playing ultra-defensive systems such as the dreaded 3-3-2-1-1. In such systems the opposition FC plays very deep and a deep defensive line will ensure that the FC is covered by the DMC/MCd. The DCs will stop him if he gets past the DMC, but in general the DMC will win the ball or force a hurried clearance which is mopped up by the DCs. They are in a lot of space so have plenty of passing options available to recycle the ball back into the attacking third of the pitch. If the d-line is too high they won’t have easy options as they are covering the FC and too much time will be wasted in trying to win the ball back for them to be able to play easy passes into space (see Breaking Down the 3-3-2-1-1).

    Farrows/Sarrows/Barrows

    My preferred system is a 4-4-2 Diamond so I’ll use that as a guide. These rules should be pretty much transferable to any formation with a little thought.

    Ultra-Attack: Long farrowed ML/R, Short farrowed FBs. This farrowing combination allows the wide players to double up on the defending side. If it is working you will see a lot of crosses nodded in at the far post by the corresponding winger.

    Attack: Long farrowed ML/R. This allows for constant pressure on the opposition whilst maintaining a tighter defensive base.

    Possession: Short farrowed ML/R, short barrowed AMC. This ensures a box-like structure around the opposition penalty area but remains more focussed on possession than on creating chances.

    Defend Lead: Sarrowed FCs: Combined with a tight defensive system sarrowed FCs offer plenty of opportunities to exploit the channels. If the AI is pushing its FBs forward expect a host of counter-attacking chances.

    NB: I also play an alternate 4-2-3-1 system that has long farrowed ML/R. On paper it looks more defensive than the Defend Lead system, but it actually focuses on getting four players forward (FC, AMC, ML/R) whereas the Defend Lead only attacks with three (FCs, AMC).

    Mentality, Through-Balls, Forward Runs, Run With Ball and Crosses

    The following provides an indicator of how I set up Forward Runs, Through Balls, Crossing & Passing Focus.

    Forward Runs

    Attack: Often FCs, AMC, ML/R. Mixed FBs, DMC. Rarely DCs

    Possession: Often FCs, AMC. Mixed ML/R, FBs. Rarely DMC, DCs

    Defend Lead: Often FCs, AMC. Mixed ML/R. Rarely FBs, DMC, DCs.

    Try Through Balls

    Often: FCd, AMC, DMC. Mixed: FCa, ML/R, FBs, DCs, GK

    Crossing

    Often: ML/R, FBs. Mixed: FCs. Rarely: AMC (unless free role), DMC, DCs

    Focus Passing

    Home: Mixed. This provides greater scope and opportunity for attacking moves.

    Away: Down Both Flanks: Exploits the channels and keeps the ball away from positions from which interceptions will be costly.

    Hold Up Ball

    At least two players should hold up the ball. I usually use my DMC and FCd in these roles, as the DMC holding the ball allows the defence to regroup and the FCd allows for the chance of wingers overlapping him which opens up more attacking angles.

    Marking

    In my opinion man-marking was horribly flawed in FM06. It worked perfectly until the AI switched tactics. Once that happened user defenders remained assigned to their original markee no matter where he was repositioned. Therefore, your DC may well end up man-marking the opposition’s ML. I believe this may have been fixed in ’07, although don’t quote me. Anyway, to combat this perceived problem I advise the following.

    Tight-Zonal: DCs, FBs, DMC

    Loose-Zonal: ML/R, AMC, FCs

    This system fits nicely with the CD/CF set up in that it ensure space for front players whilst keeps the defenders tight on their men. For a more defensive system the ML/Rs could also be pushed into tight-zonal.

    Goalkeeper

    I have always employed a sweeper-keeper with a mentality of 14 with low CF/CD, although there is no reason you shouldn’t follow general RoT settings and have the keeper’s mentality set to 4.
    Source đó, ai đọc hiểu được thì hay, tui dịch từ từ, khi nào xong up lên cho phần tiếng Việt, giờ đọc đỡ phần tiếng Anh này đi


    ------> Nếu thế này thì lúc nào dịch xong hãy up lên bạn à , chứ nếu ngồi dịch cái này chắc chơi xong 1 mùa giải trong FM rùi đó:B57:


    Because The Main One

Qui định gửi bài

  • Bạn không thể lập chủ đề mới
  • Bạn không thể gửi bài phản hồi
  • Bạn không thể gửi file đính kèm
  • Bạn không thể sửa bài viết
  •